My understanding is that Flurocarbon leader material which is sold in shorter lengths and
priced higher are basically the original flurocarbon line, with all the advantages of fluro over
mono, but quite stiff with alot of memory. The trend towards using flurocarbon line as
a mainline, available in filler and bulk spools, came later as the manufacturers modified their
formulas to make the line less stiff, less memory retention but with all the same advantages
over mono as the original. Some manufacturers say that their "leader material" is more abrasion
resistant than their "filler spool". I have felt the leader material and it is indeed "stiffer" than the
filler. In practical terms I suppose a bass fisherman who has to deal constantly with weeds, structures, logs, various obstructions may prefer more abrasion resistance. In my case chasing trout, that's really
not much of an issue. For that reason (and cost) I use the lower priced filler spool for my leaders with no complaints. It's still far more abrasion resistant than mono or even co-polymers (hybrids).
My personal preference is Seaguar InvizX which is slightly more stiff than their AbrazX. But I haven't used
many brands and frankly with the immense advantage Fluro offers over mono, I'm sure all the big-name
brands are very good.
Ken
PS- Wondering if it's going to be too windy Sunday....